USPTO serial 85406064
NEVER FOLLOW, ALWAYS LEAD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEVER FOLLOW, ALWAYS LEAD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONDON, GB
KELOWNA, BC, CA
KELOWNA, BC, CA
NEW YORK, NY
KELOWNA, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Wearing apparel, namely, t-shirts, golf shirts, shirts, jerseys, muscle shirts, barbeque aprons, ties, jackets, vests, hats, caps, toques, neck warmers, scarves, ear warmers, gloves, sun visors, socks, shorts and swim trunks; Footwear, namely, flip flops, sandals and casual shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, premixed cocktails and tequila based coolers; Flavored alcoholic malt coolers produced from brewed malt base with natural flavors | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring general merchandise; On-line retail store services featuring downloadable and streamable pre-recorded music and videos; Promotional sponsorship of entertainment, cultural and sporting events; Promoting the goods of others, namely, providing on-line information regarding coupons and discounts for the goods of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging contests; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of entertainment, cultural and sporting events; On-line entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring information on clubs, bars, lounges, restaurants and party events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOCH LOMOND DISTILLERS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VAMPT BEVERAGE USA, CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by VAMPT BEVERAGE USA, CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ANTI/ANTI CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by VAMPT BEVERAGE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by VAMPT CAPITAL PARTNERS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NEVER FOLLOW, ALWAYS LEAD.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |