Drawing for LITTER FREE LUNCH

USPTO serial 85406293

LITTER FREE LUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITTER FREE LUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil P. Movitz

NEIL P MOVITZ6900 E BELLEVIEW AVE STE 350GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111-1630UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Lunch bags; Lunch bags made of textileACTIVEJun 20, 2011
021Bottles, sold empty; Drinking flasks; Drinking vessels; Household containers for foods; Thermal insulated bags for food or beveragesACTIVEJun 20, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 21, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
May 20, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 25, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 7, 2013RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 7, 2013RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2013RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 29, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance