USPTO serial 85406413
BRITE PARENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITE PARENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lantau Island, HK
Lantau Island, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pete Bromaghim
PETE BROMAGHIM BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Parenting kits comprised of DVDs and CDs featuring parenting information and music; DVDs and CDs featuring parenting information and music; audio and video recordings featuring parenting information and music; musical sound recordings; children's educational music CDs and DVDs; children's educational software; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, journals, newsletters in the field of parenting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |