Drawing for CAPE COD SEASIDE BAKERY

USPTO serial 85407149

CAPE COD SEASIDE BAKERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPE COD SEASIDE BAKERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gail Sharps Myers

13515 Ballantyne Corporate PlaceAttn: Legal Dept.Charlotte, NC 28277

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CookiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 29, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 29, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 5, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance