Drawing for NATURE AND TECHNOLOGY WORKING TOGETHER IN PERFECT HARMONY

USPTO serial 85407236

NATURE AND TECHNOLOGY WORKING TOGETHER IN PERFECT HARMONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4178224Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2012
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NATURE AND TECHNOLOGY WORKING TOGETHER IN PERFECT HARMONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori M. Browne

398 Via El CentroOceanside, CA 92058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water filtration systems comprised of a series of filters made of fiber for filtering storm run-off water; Storm water filtration systems, namely, external filtering device for use in a local containment area for removing oil and other contaminants from storm drain effluent as it exits storm water systems; storm water filtering units featuring non-metal filtering booms and tendrils used to reduce bacteria and hydrocarbons in standing water; filters for fluids, namely, for water and area-water solutions; Storm water filtration systems, namely, external filtering device for use in a local containment area for removing oil and other contaminants from storm drain effluent as it exits storm water systemsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 21, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 24, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 9, 2019NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 201915AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Aug 6, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2019NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019PR15POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15—
Feb 6, 2019XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Feb 6, 20198.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 25, 201915AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Jan 25, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2018PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Jul 26, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2018ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2017REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2012GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2012GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2012NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance