USPTO serial 85407882
PREP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
BRIAN M DAVIS VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW ROADSUITE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoos and conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |