USPTO serial 85408119
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WAUKESHA, WI
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD S. GAREAU
RICHARD S. GAREAU IPC- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CENTRE1080 BEAVER HALL HILL, SUITE 1717MONTREAL, QUEBEC, H2Z1S8CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software covering all stages of the human resources planning cycle, from the forecasting of needs to the workforce schedule optimization. Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms covering all stages of the human resources planning cycle, from the forecasting of needs to the workforce schedule optimization | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |