USPTO serial 85408143
SUSHI TYPHOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUSHI TYPHOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher S. Adkins
CHRISTOPHER S. ADKINS WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, L.L.P.1030 15TH ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; Arcade game machines; Arcade-type electronic video games; Coin-operated video games; Coin-operated video games and game programs thereof sold as a single unit; Hand-held units for playing video games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; Hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; Japanese dice games (sugoroku); Karuta playing cards (Japanese card game); Playing cards and card games; Role playing games; Trading card games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nikkatsu Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nikkatsu Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SUSHI TYPHOON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |