Drawing for I RONSON

USPTO serial 85408169

I RONSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I RONSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth Sussmane

Kenneth Sussmane McCue, Sussmane, Zapfel, Cohen & Youbi, P.C.420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2250New York, NY 10170UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cases for mobile phonesACTIVE—
018All-purpose sports bags, beach bags, toiletry bags sold empty, shoe bags for travel, school bags, messenger bags, duffel bags, bags for carrying babies' accessories, handbags, wallets, purses, luggage, backpacks, travel bags, tote bags, change purses, cosmetic cases and bags sold empty, and umbrellas; carrying cases for train and bus passes, key cases, business card cases, luggage tags and key chains, all of the foregoing made from leather or imitation leatherACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 6, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 6, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance