USPTO serial 85409157
DANGLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DANGLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boulder City, NV
Boulder City, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting canopy tours and zip line events for entertainment purposes; Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Booking of entertainment halls; Entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of athletics; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of reality television; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of providing online video games via mobile phones and portable media players; Entertainment media production services for motion pictures, television and Internet; Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going reality based television program; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of fantasy sports leagues; Entertainment services in the nature of live mixed martial arts (MMA) events; Entertainment services, namely, an on-going television game show and games of chance to be played at a casino; Entertainment services, namely, conducting alternate reality games via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely, live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; Entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting an array of athletic events rendered live and recorded for the purpose of distribution through broadcast media; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a fighter, coach, promoter; Entertainment services, namely, production of computer-generated imagery for use in motion pictures; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring extreme arm wrestling; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, video and prose presentations featuring extreme arm wrestling; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring games and puzzles; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable virtual avatars figures for engaging in extreme arm wrestling bouts for use in virtual environments created for entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of mixed martial arts/combat sports; Multimedia entertainment software production services; Providing a website featuring entertainment information; Providing information relating to the organizing of educational, cultural, sporting, or entertainment exhibitions; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of entertainment; Provision of information relating to live entertainment; Provision of information relating to multimedia entertainment software production services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |