USPTO serial 85410879
24-7 BROADBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 24-7 BROADBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kari B. Frank
KARI B. FRANK DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application Service Provider, Namely, Hosting, Managing, Developing, and Maintaining Applications, Software, Websites and Databases in the Fields of Personal Productivity, Wireless Communication, Mobile Information Access and Remote Data Management for Wireless Delivery of Content to Handheld Computers, Laptops and Mobile Electronic Devices; Computer Services, Namely, Monitoring, Testing, Analyzing, and Reporting on the Internet Traffic Control and Content Control of the Websites of Others; Computer Services in the Nature of Customized Web Pages Featuring User-Defined Information, Personal Profiles and Information; Computer Services, Namely, Creating and Maintaining Web Sites for Others; Computer Services, Namely, Designing and Implementing Network Web Pages for Others; Hosting the Web Sites of Others on a Computer Server for a Global Computer Network; Computer Virus Protection Services; Computer Consultation in the Field of Computer Security; Maintenance of Computer Software Relating to Computer Security and Prevention of Computer Risks; Updating of Computer Software Relating to Computer Security and Prevention of Computer Risks; Computer Network Configuration Services; Computer Network Design for Others; Computer Services, Namely, Integration of Computer Software into Multiple Systems and Networks; Design and Development of Networks; Design, Deployment and Management of Wireless Networks for Others; Remote Computer Backup Services; Technical Support Services, Namely, Troubleshooting in the Nature of Diagnosing Software Problems; Technical Support Services, Namely, Installation, Administration, and Troubleshooting of Web and Database Applications; Technical Support Services, Namely, Migration of Datacenter, Server and Database Applications; Technical Support Services, Namely, Monitoring of Network Systems, Servers and Web and Database Applications and Notification of Related Events and Alerts; Technical Support Services, Namely, Technical Administration of Servers for Others and Troubleshooting in the Nature of Diagnosing Server Problems; Technical Support, Namely, Providing Back-up Computer Programs and Facilities; Installation, Maintenance and Repair of Computer Software; Installation, Maintenance and Repair of Cell Phone Related and Internet Access Software; Maintenance and Upgrading of Computer Software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |