Drawing for YEPEX

USPTO serial 85410965

YEPEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YEPEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. McLean, Esq.

Paul A. McLean, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, LLP1900 University Avenue, Fifth FloorEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services provided by mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internet to financial institutions, businesses, and consumers, namely, mobile banking, mobile money transfers, mobile purchasing, namely, providing electronic processing of credit/debit card transactions and electronic payments via mobile phone for allowing consumers to purchase goods and services of others, mobile multichannel payments, namely, bill payment services and loan payment services; Financial services, namely, stored-value cash or debit card services, namely, loading, managing, and payment processing, provided by mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 9, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 9, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 3, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance