USPTO serial 85415894
INSYNC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSYNC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pointe-Claire, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline Zion
JACQUELINE ZION PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER, LLP1500 BROADWAY FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10036-4068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for use in the provision of entertainment services, namely, computer games, card games, casino games; Optical discs containing software for use in the provision of entertainment services, namely, computer games, card games and casino games; Computer and computer networking hardware, namely, computer chips, computer servers, portable computers, handheld computers, computer cables, computer screens, computer networking hardware, computer monitors; monitors, namely, electronic display screens adapted for use in amusement and gaming apparatus, disc drives, media routers, network routers; Interactive electronic apparatus, namely, computer game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; Components for gaming machines, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters, electrical wiring, and computer hardware and software associated therewith; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones, personal digital assistants, and tablets; Gaming machines including slot machines or video lottery terminals; Electronic game accessories namely, controllers, displays, button panels, joysticks and bolsters; video game interactive control floor pads or mats; Providing online downloadable computer software for use in the provision of entertainment services, namely, computer games, card games, casino games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gaming tables | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing electronic transmission of information stored in databases via interactively communicating computer systems in gaming units located in different parts of a gaming establishment, different gaming establishments and between gaming units located in a gaming establishment and online gamers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computer software for use in the provision of entertainment services, namely, computer games, card games, casino games; Computer software hosting services in the field of computer games, card games, casino games; Installation, maintenance and repair of computer software and interactive electronic apparatus in the field of gaming and entertainment services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amaya Gaming Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INSYNC
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |