USPTO serial 85415962
ONE WORLD ONE PARTNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4283669Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2013
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONE WORLD ONE PARTNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J Walsh
William J Walsh McCandlish & Lillard11350 Random Hills Road, SUite 500www.mccandlaw.comFairfax, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES, INCLUDING CONSULTING WITH BUSINESSES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EMPLOYMENT STAFFING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2010 |
| 037 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, NAMELY, INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2010 |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY SERVICES, NAMELY, ADVISING OTHERS REGARDING REMOTE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TESTING ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, EVALUATING AND ANALYZING THE COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE OF OTHERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING QUALITY ASSURANCE TO THIRD PARTIES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, AND DATA WAREHOUSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Intelligence Systems, Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Intelligence Systems, Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONE WORLD ONE PARTNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |