USPTO serial 85416263
CLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Meier
LAWRENCE H MEIER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN ST STE 600BURLINGTON, VT 05401 8339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for characterization of musical compositions; computer software for the comparison of attributes within musical compositions; computer software for the identification of similar musical compositions based on similarities between certain attributes of the musical composition; computer software for detection of copyright infringement; computer software for generating metadata describing attributes of musical compositions; computer application software for mobile phones for characterization of musical compositions; computer application software for mobile phones for the comparison of attributes within musical compositions; computer application software for mobile phones for the identification of similar musical compositions based on similarities between certain attributes of the musical composition; computer application software for mobile phones for detection of copyright infringement; and computer application software for mobile phones for generating metadata describing attributes of musical compositions | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for characterization of musical compositions; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for the comparison of attributes within musical compositions; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for the identification of similar musical compositions based on similarities between certain attributes of the musical composition; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for detection of copyright infringement; and software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for generating metadata describing attributes of musical compositions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |