Drawing for THE TILE COMMANDMENTS

USPTO serial 85417388

THE TILE COMMANDMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE TILE COMMANDMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Moshe D. Lapin

MOSHE D. LAPIN NATOLI-LEGAL, LLC305 Broadway7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Writing and providing an online column and articles about tiles and interior design; entertainment services, namely, an on-going television show about tiles and interior design; publication of magazines, newspapers and books about tiles and interior designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance