Drawing for DREAM MAKER

USPTO serial 85417621

DREAM MAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAM MAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005insecticides; rejectants, namely, pest control repellents for use in deterring insects and verminACTIVE—
016general purpose plastic bags; plastic film for wrappingACTIVE—
017chemical fiber thread not for textile useACTIVE—
019insect screens not of metalACTIVE—
022chemical fibers for textile use; netting; hammocksACTIVE—
023fiber thread and fiber yarn impregnated with insecticideACTIVE—
024woven fabrics, felt, non-woven textile fabrics, vinyl coated cloth, curtainsACTIVE—
025clothes including non-Japanese style outer-clothing, namely, coats, sweaters pants, jackets, shoes, dresses, hats and shirts; Japanese traditional clothing, namely, kimonos, coats, pants, jackets, dresses, shoes, hats, and shirts; aprons; scarves; gloves; headwearACTIVE—
027wallpaperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 1, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 1, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 1, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance