Drawing for EL BATEY DEL CEMÍ

USPTO serial 85419024

EL BATEY DEL CEMÍ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL BATEY DEL CEMÍ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rafael Aponte García

P.O. BOX 194221SAN JUAN, PR 00919-4221UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Agricultural advice; agricultural advice, namely, providing recommendations for plant and soil nutrition supplements; agricultural services, namely, compost spreading; agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, pruning and picking fruits, vegetables and root plants for others; horticultural processes and turf or lawn care services, namely, providing preparation and development of turfgrass and/or soil for providing an environment that encourages improved growth attributes; horticultural services; horticultural services, namely, installing sod; horticultural services, namely, soil conditioning, improvement and maintenance for indoor and outdoor arenas and demonstration areas; providing information regarding plant and flower identification for horticultural purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2011RTTPRESTORE TO TEAS PLUS—
Dec 22, 2011RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Dec 22, 2011RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Dec 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance