USPTO serial 85419054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mississauga Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Bondra
ROBERT BONDRA OAKLAND LAW GROUP, PLLC38955 HILLS TECH DRFARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331-3431UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laptop carrying cases; carrying cases for tablet-style computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Passport holders; money clips; desktop organizers; desktop business card holders; document portfolios; stationery type portfolios; personal organizers, desk pads and writing pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bags, cases and carryalls, namely, tote bags, shoulder bags, belt bags, satchels, backpacks, garment bags for travel, duffle bags, briefcases, waist packs, luggage, clutches, top handle handbags, messenger bags, flap handbags, purses, multi-compartment handbags, mini handbags, office shoulder bags, compact handbags, cosmetic cases sold empty, leather bands, attaché cases, key cases, luggage tags, general purposes sport trolley bags, coin purses, key rings, wristlets, bum bags, wallets, credit card holders, business card holders in the nature of wallets and card cases, travel kit bags, brief-case type portfolios, grooming organizers for travel, jewelry organizers for travel | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |