Drawing for BRODERICK PARK BAKERY

USPTO serial 85419118

BRODERICK PARK BAKERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRODERICK PARK BAKERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Turung

Brian E. Turung Fay Sharpe, LLP1228 Euclid Ave, Halle Bldg, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Fully finished cakes; ice cream cakes; cheesecakes; and mousse cakesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 17, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance