Drawing for ML1

USPTO serial 85419267

ML1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ML1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

MICHAEL J. LEONARD PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO & NADEL LLP2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and electronic game programs; computer and electronic game software; downloadable electronic games via the Internet and wireless devicesACTIVE—
028Stand alone video game machines; stand alone video output machines; coin operated video games; computerized video table games for gaming purposes; video output game machines for use with external display screen or monitor; table top upright video output gaming machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 18, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance