USPTO serial 85419509
LEVEL (3) THINK AHEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEVEL (3) THINK AHEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natalie Hanlon-Leh
NATALIE HANLON-LEH FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP1700 LINCOLN ST3200 Wells Fargo CenterDENVER, CO 80203-4500Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS FOR USE BY THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS TO PROVISION SERVICES TO OTHERS, NAMELY, MANAGING TELEPHONE, VOICE, DATA, GRAPHICS, IMAGES, AUDIO AND VIDEO COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR OTHER CARRIERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS GATEWAY SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE TELEPHONE LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE SERVICES, FACSIMILE, AND DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES VIA A FIBER OPTIC NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE MAIL SERVICES; ELECTRONIC STREAMING, TRANSMISSION AND DELIVERY OF AUDIO AND VIDEO MESSAGES AND IMAGES ON THE INTERNET OR AN INTRANET; TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICES AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; PROVIDING COMPUTER NETWORK ACCESS SERVICES TO OTHERS NAMELY ETHERNET SERVICES, MANAGED ROUTER SERVICES AND VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS (VPN); PROVIDING VIDEO, VOICE AND DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES USING AN INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE, NAMELY TELECOMMUNICATION HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT; PROVIDING FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND VOICE, DATA, GRAPHICS, IMAGES, AUDIO AND VIDEO TRANSPORT-BASED COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR USE BY CLOUD COMPUTING PROVIDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER NETWORK CONFIGURATION SERVICES; COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NAMELY, MONITORING OF NETWORK SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, MONITORING, TESTING, ANALYZING, AND REPORTING ON THE INTERNET TRAFFIC CONTROL AND CONTENT CONTROL OF THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS; COMPUTER SECURITY SERVICES, NAMELY, RESTRICTING ACCESS TO AND BY COMPUTER NETWORKS TO AND OF UNDESIRED WEBSITES, PROTECTION AGAINST DENIAL OF SERVICE (DOS) AND WORM ATTACKS, MEDIA AND INDIVIDUALS AND FACILITIES; INTRUSION DETECTION, COMPUTER VIRUS PROTECTION AND PROVIDING MANAGED FIREWALL SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, FILTERING OF UNWANTED E-MAILS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CLOUD HOSTING PROVIDER SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Level 3 Communications, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Level 3 Communications, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEVEL (3) THINK AHEAD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |