Drawing for JEFE DE JEFES

USPTO serial 85419698

JEFE DE JEFES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEFE DE JEFES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dorothy Richardson

DOROTHY RICHARDSON LAW OFFICES OF DOROTHY B. RICHARDSON21900 BURBANK BLVD STE 21900WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-6469UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital media, namely, pre-recorded video cassettes, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, downloadable audio and video recordings, DVDs, and high definition digital discs featuring dramatic and musical performances; Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring dramatic and musical performances; Video and computer game programsACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of a dramatic television series; Production of DVDs, videotapes and television programs featuring dramatic and musical performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 18, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 3, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 6, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance