USPTO serial 85420457
NEUROLEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEUROLEADERSHIP INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NeuroLeadership Institute Pty Ltd
New South Wales 2026, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
BASSAM N. IBRAHIM BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PCPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound and visual recordings featuring business leadership development; interactive sound and visual recordings featuring business leadership development; sound and visual recording media, namely, CD's and DVD's featuring business leadership development; electronic publications recorded on computer media featuring business leadership development; electronic publications, namely, newspapers, journals, magazines and inserts and supplements therefor featuring business leadership development | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter and publications, namely, periodical publications, serial publications, newspapers, magazines, books, booklets, journals, brochures, instructional and teaching materials, all featuring business leadership development; photographs; printed visuals in the nature of promotional materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, conducting seminars, webinars, exhibitions, classes and workshops; instruction and training all in the field of business leadership development; provision of educational, instructional and training courses in the field of business leadership development; arranging and conducting educational conferences in the field of business leadership development; distance education, namely, provision of education teaching and training via computer-based networks in the field of business leadership development; university services, namely, providing courses at the university level; production of films and of radio and television programmes; rental of films; library services; organisation and presentation of workshop, seminar and exhibition events for education purposes in the field of business leadership development; production of sound and video recordings; consultancy and advisory services relating to the aforesaid, namely, business training consulting services, leadership development consultancy and leadership assessment consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NeuroLeadership Institute Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NEUROLEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |