Drawing for SKINNYGIRL

USPTO serial 85420504

SKINNYGIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKINNYGIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia W. Stangle

CLAUDIA W. STANGLE LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.180 N STETSON AVE STE 49002 PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance