Drawing for MAX'S HIGHWAY DINER

USPTO serial 85420560

MAX'S HIGHWAY DINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX'S HIGHWAY DINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Pollock

ANDREW S POLLOCK REMBOLT LUDTKE LLP1201 LINCOLN MALL STE 102LINCOLN, NE 68508-2888UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and catering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 1, 2013ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 20, 2013MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Feb 19, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 11, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 11, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 10, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 10, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance