USPTO serial 85420668
DATA RECAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2013
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATA RECAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
DANIEL E. KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 N WATER ST STE 1800MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6648UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for enterprise resource planning systems (ERPs) for the integration and automation of business practices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Sep 13, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| May 15, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jan 5, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jan 4, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Dec 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Oct 29, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 26, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | โ |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Sep 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Sep 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |