Drawing for BLUE CRAB BRAND

USPTO serial 85421471

BLUE CRAB BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE CRAB BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen G. Janoski

STEPHEN G. JANOSKI Butzel Long1909 K Street, N.W., Suite 500Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CRUSTACEANS, CRAB, NONE OF THE FOREGOING BEING LIVE; CRAB MEAT; PACKAGE COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRAB MEAT; PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRAB MEAT; PREPARED APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRAB MEAT; FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRAB MEAT; FROZEN APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRAB MEATACTIVE—
035DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FEATURING CRUSTACEANS, CRAB AND CRAB MEAT; RETAIL AND WHOLESALE STORE SERVICES FEATURING CRUSTACEANS, CRAB AND CRAB MEATACTIVE—
040CRUSTACEANS, CRAB AND CRAB MEAT PROCESSING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 3, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 18, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance