USPTO serial 85421801
NOIZE ENTERTAINMENT EXPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOIZE ENTERTAINMENT EXPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Premjit Panicker, Esq.
360 N. La Cienega Blvd., 3rd FloorLos Angeles, CA 90048UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting nightclub entertainment events; Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; Booking of entertainment halls; Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of music, sports, dance, video gaming, motion pictures, television, food, fashion, art, visual arts; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Entertainment event booking agencies; Entertainment in the nature of an on-going special variety, news, music or comedy show featuring music, sports, dance, video gaming, food, fashion, art, visual art broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment in the nature of live performances by musical artists, dancers, actors; Entertainment in the nature of live stage performances in the nature of music, dance or lecture for hire in the field of music, dance, video gaming, television, motion pictures, food, fashion, art, visual arts by an individual; Entertainment in the nature of providing an informational and entertainment website in the fields of celebrity gossip, entertainment, sports and fitness; Entertainment in the nature of symphony orchestra performances; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by musical artists; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; Entertainment in the nature of live musical artists, live dancing, live sporting events; Entertainment in the nature of online computer video games; Entertainment information services, namely, providing information and news releases about a musical artist; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; Entertainment services in the nature of musical, dance, acting performances; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting of competitions for sporting events; Entertainment services, namely, conducting carnivals; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; Entertainment services, namely, dance events by a recording artist; Entertainment services, namely, displaying a series of films; Entertainment services, namely, fireworks displays; Entertainment services, namely, multimedia production services; Entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting an array of athletic events rendered live and recorded for the purpose of distribution through broadcast media; Entertainment services, namely, performing and competing in motor sports events; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a musical artists, music industry individuals, motion picture industry individuals, television industry individuals, video gaming industry individuals, dancers, sports industry individuals, food and beverage industry, fashion industry, art industry; Entertainment services, namely, providing information about a recording artist via an online network; Entertainment services, namely, providing live entertainment by dancers via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing news and information via a website in the field of skateboarding, the culture of skateboarding and skateboard product reviews; Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going webisodes featuring music, art, sports, fashion, video games, food, dance via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music, art, sports, video games, fashion, food, dance; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of music, art, sports, fashion, video games, food, dance; Entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, wine and food tastings; Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; Entertainment, namely, live performances by musical bands; Entertainment, namely, live performances by rock groups; Fashion modeling for entertainment purposes; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of development, production and post-production services in the fields of video and films; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Organisation of fashion shows for entertainment purposes; Organization of exhibitions for musical entertainment; Organizing and arranging exhibitions for entertainment purposes; Organizing on-line exhibitions and conferences in the fields of education, culture, sports and entertainment for non-business and non-commercial purposes; Providing a website featuring information in the field of music and entertainment; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of entertainment, cultural and sporting events; Providing information relating to educational and entertainment activities and events for children; Providing information relating to the organizing of educational, cultural, sporting, or entertainment exhibitions; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of entertainment; Providing online interviews featuring musical artists, music industry individuals, motion picture industry individuals, television industry individuals, video gaming industry individuals, dancers, athletes, sports industry individuals, food and beverage industry, fashion industry, art industry in the field of music, fashion, food, dance, art, sports, video games, motion pictures, television for entertainment purposes | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |