Drawing for NANO CUTICLE

USPTO serial 85423019

NANO CUTICLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NANO CUTICLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Clown wigs; Hair pieces and wigs; Tape for fixing wigs; Wig caps; Wigs; Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hairABANDONEDSep 10, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 22, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 22, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 5, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance