USPTO serial 85423493
VIDEO RECOGNITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEO RECOGNITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVE FL 23BOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | administration, management and implementation of employee incentive award programs for others to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; administration, management and implementation of sales incentive programs to promote the sale and services of others; administration, management and implementation of employee recognition programs for the purpose of promoting employee engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; consulting services in connection with creating and managing incentive programs for third party businesses to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale of their employees; managing online incentive award and recognition programs for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, hosting and managing an online website that enables third party companies to administer and manage employee award and recognition programs to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; providing online, non-downloadable software for administration, management, and implementation of employee incentive award and recognition programs to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; providing online, non-downloadable software for administration, management, and implementation of sales incentive programs to promote the sale of products and services of others; providing online, non-downloadable software for administration, management, and implementation of employee recognition programs for the purpose of promoting on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |