USPTO serial 85423536
FLIGHT CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIGHT CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milord A. Keshishian
MILORD A KESHISHIAN MILORD & ASSOCIATES PC2049 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 3850LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3149Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment information services, namely, providing information and news releases about a musical artist; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; Entertainment services, namely, providing information about a recording artist via an online network; Music composition for others; Music composition services; Music production services; Music publishing services; Providing a website featuring information in the field of music and entertainment, excluding information in the field of burlesque shows, beauty pageants and adult entertainment; Production and distribution of music recordings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |