Drawing for PROVEN FHA LENDER TOP 10 FANNIE MAE DUS'LENDER STRONG REPEAT CLIENT BASE SMALL LOANS BRIDGE LOANS MEZZANINE LOANS PROVEN STRONG FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP FIRST CLASS CUSTOMER SERVICE DIVERSE PRODUCT LINE TOP SMALL LOAN LENDER IN HOUSE SERVICING

USPTO serial 85423806

PROVEN FHA LENDER TOP 10 FANNIE MAE DUS'LENDER STRONG REPEAT CLIENT BASE SMALL LOANS BRIDGE LOANS MEZZANINE LOANS PROVEN STRONG FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP FIRST CLASS CUSTOMER SERVICE DIVERSE PRODUCT LINE TOP SMALL LOAN LENDER IN HOUSE SERVICING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4311443Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 2, 2013
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROVEN FHA LENDER TOP 10 FANNIE MAE DUS'LENDER STRONG REPEAT CLIENT BASE SMALL LOANS BRIDGE LOANS MEZZANINE LOANS PROVEN STRONG FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP FIRST CLASS CUSTOMER SERVICE DIVERSE PRODUCT LINE TOP SMALL LOAN LENDER IN HOUSE SERVICING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen I. Levin

Karen I. Levin; Damias A. Wilson CULLEN AND DYKMAN LLP100 QUENTIN ROOSEVELT BLVD STE 402GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely, mortgage lending servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDFeb 25, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2016C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 27, 2016C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 27, 2016ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance