Drawing for GG GATSBY

USPTO serial 85424959

GG GATSBY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GG GATSBY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander M. Gerasimow

LINDA EMERY VON BRIESEN & ROPER SC411 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1000MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4427UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care, treatment and styling products and preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, sprays, non-medicated hair serum, masks, gels, straightening preparations, cleansers, pomades, glosses, and coloring preparations; cosmetics and color cosmetics; non-medicated preparations for skin care; fragrances and perfumery; soapsACTIVEAug 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 15, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 15, 2015EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Dec 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance