CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RIVERPIMP

USPTO serial 85425054

RIVERPIMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIVERPIMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A Buck

WILLIAM A BUCK LEECH TISHMAN FUSCALDO & LAMPL, LLC525 WILLIAM PENN PL FL 30PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, tee shirts, vests, sweater, sweatshirt, hats, caps, pants and wadersACTIVE—
028Toys and sporting goods, namely, fishing poles, fishing rods and reels, artificial fishing bait and, fishing luresACTIVE—
041Educational services in the nature of fishing lessonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 18, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 21, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance