Drawing for GREENLIGHT RECYCLED · RENEWABLE · SUSTAINABLE

USPTO serial 85425185

GREENLIGHT RECYCLED · RENEWABLE · SUSTAINABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENLIGHT RECYCLED · RENEWABLE · SUSTAINABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Hochman

DAVID HOCHMAN WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1550UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Comforters; bed blankets; lap blankets; travelling blankets; throws; mattress padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 22, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 3, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance