Drawing for I-ROCK

USPTO serial 85426233

I-ROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-ROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TERESA C. TUCKER

TERESA C TUCKER GROSSMAN TUCKER ET AL55 S COMMERCIAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Adhesive foils for eyes, lips and nails; glitter for eyes, lips and nails; face and body glitter, stencils for nails, false nails, nail enamels; nail gel, nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter, adhesives for attaching artificial fingernails and/or eyelashes, body are pens and crayons, temporary tattoo sprays and stencils therefor sold as a unit; colour for eyes, lips, and nailsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
May 22, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 17, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2012LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Feb 8, 2012LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance