USPTO serial 85426493
OPTISPENSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTISPENSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman P. Soloway
NORMAN P. SOLOWAY HAYES SOLOWAY, P.C.4640 E SKYLINE DRTUCSON, AZ 85718-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, a drug delivery system comprising eye droppers filled with therapeutic agents in liquid form, namely, vitamins, dietary and nutritional supplements and pharmaceutical products for glaucoma, conjunctivitis, cataract, dry eye, pink eye, red eye, allergies, macular degeneration, ocular surface disorders, amblyopia, inflammation of the eye, and eye infection | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2012 |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, drug delivery systems; eyedroppers sold empty | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IntelliMedicine, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IntelliMedicine, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named OPTISPENSER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |