Drawing for FRANKLINCOVEY EXCELERATORS

USPTO serial 85427068

FRANKLINCOVEY EXCELERATORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRANKLINCOVEY EXCELERATORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alissa R. Owen

2200 PARKWAY BLVDSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84119-2099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable webinars in the field of professional and personal productivity, leadership, management, education, sales, communication, professional and personal assessment development, measurement and organization through time management and communication; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for wireless content delivery and mobile information access for task delegation, reporting, event scheduling, calendaring and time management all in the field of personal and business productivity, leadership, management, and professional and personal development; CDs and DVDs featuring information in the field of professional and personal productivity, leadership, management, education, sales, organizational communication, professional and personal assessment development, measurement and organization through time management and communicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 22, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 23, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance