Drawing for CHILD'S PLAY

USPTO serial 85427193

CHILD'S PLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILD'S PLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Weinberg

STEVEN M. WEINBERG HOLMES WEINBERG, PC30765 PACIFIC COAST HWY STE 411MALIBU, CA 90265-3646UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going game show series delivered by television, radio, satellite, the internet, mobile telephone communications, or streamed via the internet; entertainment services, namely, providing an interactive non-downloadable computer game, available on-line and through mobile telephone or communications networks; entertainment services, namely, providing interactive web journals and blogs featuring information and stories in the field of a game shows, available on-line and through mobile telephone or communications networks; providing entertainment information about a game show series, through the internet and through mobile telephone communications networks; entertainment services in the nature of sweepstakes services; entertainment services in the nature of an amusement park attraction, namely, a themed areaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 18, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 17, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance