Drawing for ALLURE THE BEAUTY EXPERT

USPTO serial 85428234

ALLURE THE BEAUTY EXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALLURE THE BEAUTY EXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela Rask

PAMELA RASK SABIN BERMANT & GOULDFOUR TIMES SQUARE23RD FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036-6518

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software application featuring fashion and beauty information for use in connection with smartphones, PDA devices, tablet computers and other portable and hand held digital electronic devicesACTIVESep 24, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 13, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2013CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 14, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 12, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance