Drawing for APRELLO

USPTO serial 85428310

APRELLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOBO, DEBORAH E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APRELLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melanie Howard

MELANIE HOWARD LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for retail inventory management; computer software for the field of fashion, namely, to manage inventory and samples; computer software designed for use in connection with public relations and promotional activities in the field of fashion, namely, to manage and control the use of samples and other commodities providing unique identifiers to track and trace product and provide a central communications platformACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 21, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance