USPTO serial 85429191
BOXWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOXWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
PALO ALTO, CA
Los Altos, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software development tools for content management in a cloud; computer software for tracking changes and modifications to software and for managing software development projects; computer software, namely, application interfaces, plugins, and protocol interfaces and computer software development tools for design and development of open-source and proprietary software programs; computer software for cloud content management; computer programs for running development programs and application programs in a common development environment; computer software for use as a tool for automating, personalizing, designing and updating web sites, website templates, web site graphics, text and animation for a global computer network, internal and external computer networks, and/or local and/or wide area computer networks; computer software for providing access to, providing information to, and obtaining information from computer networks for cloud content management | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning computers, computer software, document management, workgroups, business communications, business management and advertising, and small business issues | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs discussing business, technology, cloud computing, online collaboration and file sharing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information; application service provider, namely, providing non-downloadable computer programs for running development programs and application programs in a common development environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Box.net, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOXWORKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |