Drawing for CLOUD ENTERTAINMENT

USPTO serial 85429640

CLOUD ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUD ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Stringham

JOHN C. STRINGHAM WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services provided by mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internet, namely, mobile banking, mobile money transfers, mobile purchasing, namely, providing electronic processing of credit/debit card transactions and electronic payments via mobile phone for allowing consumers to purchase goods and services of others, mobile multi channel payments, namely, bill payment services and loan payment services; Financial services, namely, stored-value cash or debit card services, namely, loading, managing, and payment processing, provided by mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance