USPTO serial 85431008
GLOWHOUSE KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOWHOUSE KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H.E. Bursik, Esq.
401 HAMBURG TPKE STE 202WAYNE, NJ 07470-2139UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services for children, namely, providing interactive play areas, instructional classes in the field of child enrichment session services and child creative play services and child birthday party services and social gatherings for children, all relating to the subject matter of constructing a nurturing environment where children will experience positivity through creativity for optimum development while providing a supportive outlet for parents and the community | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kinailuk, Kevin
- Other trademarks owned by Kinailuk, Kevin
- Other trademarks owned by Kinailuk, Elisa
- Other trademarks owned by Kinailuk, Elisa
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GLOWHOUSE KIDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |