Drawing for HTC TOP HONORS

USPTO serial 85431028

HTC TOP HONORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HTC TOP HONORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erin S. Hennessy

Erin S. Hennessy BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP701 5TH AVE STE 6200SEATTLE, WA 98104-7018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing recognition and incentives by way of awards and contests to demonstrate excellence in the field of technology and software development; providing a website featuring information on an award program for excellence in the field of technology software developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance