Drawing for ALL CLEAN

USPTO serial 85431851

ALL CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing compounds for use on hard surfaces for household useABANDONEDSep 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance