Drawing for PNI

USPTO serial 85432377

PNI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PNI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. MacDermott

MICHAEL J. MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006NAILS; METAL STAPLES FOR CONSTRUCTION OR INDUSTRIAL USE; FLOORING NAILS AND METAL FLOORING STAPLES FOR CONSTRUCTION OR INDUSTRIAL USEACTIVE—
007POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, NAILERS AND CASES FOR SAME; POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, STAPLERS AND CASES FOR SAME; POWER BRAD NAILERS AND CASES FOR SAME; ELECTRIC MOTOR DRIVEN NAILING DEVICES, NAMELY, NAILING MACHINES, NAILING GUNS; BATTERY DRIVEN NAILING DEVICES, NAMELY, NAILING MACHINES, NAILING GUNS; HAND-HELD ELECTRIC AND BATTERY DRIVEN NAILING DEVICES, NAMELY, NAILING MACHINES, NAILING GUNS; JIGS FOR POWER OPERATED ROUTERS; AIR COMPRESSORS; PARTS FOR COMPRESSED AIR TOOLS, NAMELY, AIR HOSES AND REGULATORSACTIVE—
008HAND TOOLS FOR DISPENSING, GUIDING, AND SEATING NAILS; HAND OPERATED SHEAR CUTTER TOOLS; SHEER CUTTER BLADES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, FLOORING JACKS, NAMELY, FLOOR TIGHTENER AND STRAIGHTENER; HAND-OPERATED NAILERS AND STAPLERS FOR THE WOOD FLOORING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; HAND OPERATED NAIL PUNCHESACTIVE—
035ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FLOOR FASTENING TOOLS AND WOOD WORKING TOOLSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance