USPTO serial 85432377
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J. MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | NAILS; METAL STAPLES FOR CONSTRUCTION OR INDUSTRIAL USE; FLOORING NAILS AND METAL FLOORING STAPLES FOR CONSTRUCTION OR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, NAILERS AND CASES FOR SAME; POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, STAPLERS AND CASES FOR SAME; POWER BRAD NAILERS AND CASES FOR SAME; ELECTRIC MOTOR DRIVEN NAILING DEVICES, NAMELY, NAILING MACHINES, NAILING GUNS; BATTERY DRIVEN NAILING DEVICES, NAMELY, NAILING MACHINES, NAILING GUNS; HAND-HELD ELECTRIC AND BATTERY DRIVEN NAILING DEVICES, NAMELY, NAILING MACHINES, NAILING GUNS; JIGS FOR POWER OPERATED ROUTERS; AIR COMPRESSORS; PARTS FOR COMPRESSED AIR TOOLS, NAMELY, AIR HOSES AND REGULATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | HAND TOOLS FOR DISPENSING, GUIDING, AND SEATING NAILS; HAND OPERATED SHEAR CUTTER TOOLS; SHEER CUTTER BLADES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, FLOORING JACKS, NAMELY, FLOOR TIGHTENER AND STRAIGHTENER; HAND-OPERATED NAILERS AND STAPLERS FOR THE WOOD FLOORING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; HAND OPERATED NAIL PUNCHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FLOOR FASTENING TOOLS AND WOOD WORKING TOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |