USPTO serial 85432563
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | All manner of packaging, namely, blister cards; folding cartons of paperboard or cardboard, plastic or paper bags for merchandise packaging, polyethylene bags for packaging, pressure sensitive adhesive labels, pressure sensitive paper labels, all for use in the consumer and household goods, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, healthcare, medical, dental and veterinary industries, goods distributed in physician and dental offices and pharmacies, cosmetic, beauty and personal care, hospital, long term care and nursing homes, confectionary, food and beverages industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | All manner of packaging, namely, multi-purpose thermoplastic heat shrinkable tubing and sleeves all for use in the consumer and household goods, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, healthcare, medical, dental and veterinary industries, goods distributed in physician and dental offices and pharmacies, cosmetic, beauty and personal care, hospital, long term care and nursing homes, confectionary, food and beverages industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | All manner of packaging, namely, biodegradable plastic based containers for commercial packaging in the nature of bottles and jars, all for use in the consumer and household goods, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, healthcare, medical, dental and veterinary industries, goods distributed in physician and dental offices and pharmacies, cosmetic, beauty and personal care, hospital, long term care and nursing homes, confectionary, food and beverages industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Merchandise packaging of products for others; packaging for others for transportation of small articles, namely, solids, liquids, powders, and creams; consultation services in the field of environmentally conscious packaging; contract packaging articles to the order and specification of others for the pharmaceutical, healthcare, cosmetic and beauty, hospital, long term care, nursing homes, confectionary, food and beverages industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of packaging materials, namely, containers, cartons, bags, jars and vials; printing on all manner of packaging, namely, containers, cartons, bags, jars, vials and wrappers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of packaging materials, namely, contains, cartons, bags, jars and vials; design of product packaging for others; design of environmentally conscious product packaging for others; consultation services for the design of environmentally conscious product packaging for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |