Drawing for TOVOLO

USPTO serial 85432845

TOVOLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOVOLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Priya Sinha Cloutier

PRIYA SINHA CLOUTIER KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL1201 3RD AVE STE 2900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3028UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Vegetable and fruit corers, hand-operated slicers, cheese planes, wire cheese slicer, citrus zesters, hand- operated reamers for citrus, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, pizza cuttersACTIVEMay 9, 2004
021Non-electric egg beaters, reamers for fruit juice, corn cob holders, cookery molds, cake molds, pastry molds, scoops, ice cube molds, garlic presses, brushes for basting meat; Bowls; Cheese graters; Cooking strainers; Cooking utensil, namely, batter dispenser; Cup cake molds; Food basters; Garlic presses; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Ice cube molds; Ice cube molds for refrigerators; Kitchen containers; Kitchen ladles; Ladles, for kitchen use; Mixing bowls; Mixing spoons; Non-electric egg beaters; Non-electric food mixers; Pastry molds; Serving spoons; Strainers for household purposes; Tea infusers; Tea strainersACTIVEMay 9, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 1, 2013ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 22, 2012RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 22, 2012RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 3, 2012DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance